http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch Comments on: British Ubermensch Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:55:32 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/ http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c621767727172339772 breitling Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:29:53 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c621767727172339772 Thanks for this useful postlink: http://www.breitlingwatchesstore.co.uk link: http://www.breitlingwatchesstore.co.uk
]]> http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c193975043972868005 ContrivedCoder Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:42:32 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c193975043972868005 Dammit, I'm not Asian either. Although... I am Mediterranean in origin. So does that make me Greek enough? Joking aside, some things in this blog are the atypically typical things I usually ponder. And in retrospect, poking fun at the article, is relatively a waste of time. Contrition takes too long to realign the stupidity in this world, to prevent the things that shouldn't happen, from happening again. http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c148665812513433681 Dr. Kawashima Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:11:20 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c148665812513433681 Ron, is most certainly right. The history of Aryan barbarians has been covered up. The Greeks began civilization. Brown eyed people are the true Gods of this world. Inbred blue-eye filth is no match for the intelligent brown-eyed Asians. http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c110187286596503340 Rob Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:17:18 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c110187286596503340 Oh all those brown eyed Brilliant asiatic people must be stupid. This article is stupid. Just look at Japans, The entire modern western world was formed by predominantly brown eyed white-tan skinned men. Look at Greece, all you "superior" Aryans were Barbaric scum only to be civilized by the Roman Empire. http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c781284713155022682 ContrivedCoder Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:17:58 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c781284713155022682 Curse my dirty and seedy, hazel brown eyes... Ha, seeming as my IQ is the maximum you can test with the basic standard of tests (170), and my real IQ has yet to be accurately estimated, I had a hoot digging this out of your blog and reading it. I particularly liked your stab at the vast array of doctorates being handed out to complete idiots. There's no real standard in conventional education anymore... sigh. Yet one more reason I refuse to waste any more time on qualifications, that are regulated improperly, and are no real measure of credibly defined intelligence. At least I'm Caucasian... so I'm not COMPLETELY lost to "bad" genetics, eh? And luca, if you ever read this: none of the words written in the article mean anything at all. There's no scientific evidence or proof given in the article: simply a loose correlation of the odd named individual, that can be considered by the reading demographic to be credited with the word, "intelligence." None of the people listed have any real "strategic planning," that you can fame them for. Strategic thinking is mainly for military purposes, so why aren't famous and successful military commanders listed in the Mail on Sunday? I can with no real effort at all, ratify that the "name dropping" the paper does, is merely there to grab attention: the names are well-known enough for people to gossip among themselves about the occasional intellectual the article lists. I find the article itself condescending to all those that read it, thus being condescending also to itself. I am trailing off in a lengthy retort, because I'm an incredibly keen scholar of strategy and game theory. The last thing I'm LESS adept in, would be "strategic planning." http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c990818792094396674 Bob the Chef Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:33:12 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c990818792094396674 Seig heil or whatever it is? http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c194543206472888922 luca Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:06:57 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c194543206472888922 Speaking as someone with green eyes, i have no vested interest either way, but to be fair all the article states is that blue eyed folks are better in strategic planning. It doesn't mean that they are essentially smarter just that they are more adept in this particular regard. http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c120804286913618411 strix Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:19:29 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c120804286913618411 @Matt: Now that's a YouTube comment right there.link: http://strix.org.uk link: http://strix.org.uk
]]> http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c902760710183276845 Matt Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:08:05 +0000 http://strix.org.uk/posts/British-Ubermensch#c902760710183276845 The Mail isn't anywhere near as right wing as the hateful, fascist Guardian Newspaper. Read by posh, young Tories who feel it more trendy to associate themselves with the likes of Che Guevara , they call themselves left wing while all the time having a very capitalist opinion. Proof the Guardian Newspaper is a Fascist rag: it is very pro EU-therefore dislikes democracy and habeas corpus, witch hunts are carried out on people who have a differing political opinion and it hates free speech (political correctness)- to name but a few.