Anonymous writes...

it is not christian, believe me

nudely writes...

I do not believe you, whoever said it is not Christian. In fact, those who cannot see the Christianity in this is probably just a bigot and probably not a Christian.

Anonymous writes...

Bear arms, bare arms:

In this country, founded on religious principals, the right to bear arms was at first because of the fear that if that right were not granted, a suppressive government armed could suppress all the rights of the governed by force, and that the forefathers of our country had the foresight to see that as good as we could get, we could head in the wrong direction if the rights of individuals were not held up over the rights of the rulers, and that the governors would in effect be held to a level playing field by law, the supreme law of this country.

Little did the forefathers know at the time that the right to Bare Arms was just as as important.

You might ask why it was just as important to bare arms as it was to bear arms, strange? No, not really. You see, the forefathers bathed many times in the nude, not even thinking that it was not an inherent right, that in fact, it was nearly unmentionable as to the right of privacy, explicit and many times implied in the practice of social nudism not mentioned by any sanctions of law. It was just a matter of turning away, that is what many did to give one room in a river to bathe nude. Women bathed many times in a river nude in that day. Men also.

But no one paid attention to the natural right that would be debated much later.

It was not a question of one`s right to Bare Arms, but a question of the utmost right to have one`s own privacy protected against a scandalous reputation such as to cause one an economic loss of a job or position important to the moral leadership of this country. Nudity had nothing to do with immoral.

It was the right of privacy and the proctection of it that was the number one moral cause, not of nudity, but of privacy./

You know, that might sound weird, but in reality, that was what the forefathers knew inherently, that the private right to bathe nude should have been a natural thought as say the right to bear a gun against a bear in the woods.

Or, as we say, the right to protect one self against harm had a direct link to the right to protect one`s honor and dignity. It was not dishonorous to be caught nude in a river while bathing, neither did it cause anyone to lose one`s dignity, as many of our forefathers could attest to their personal right to bathe nude. And while undressing, or dressing, brief exposure occured, innocently, with no one saying anything more because of the inherent right that a neighbor felt obligated to protect.

Now, we come full circle to the issue of privacy versus nudism. In a private setting such as what Nudist or naturists are in, the right to privacy has well been established in the thoughts of long ago men who would have called you an imbecile if you could not see the forest through the trees on what was acceptable privately, and what was not.

Concuspicuousness was what was unacceptable, or sexual acts in public, not the mere fact of nudity alone. And our courts have been very clear on this concept, except in one obvious area. Unfortunately, there are die hard prudes out there who would pishaw nudity simply because of ignorance bording on the imbicile.

What? Are you a cad for believing that nudism is inherently sexual? Well, I said it. I wrote it, and so did the forefathers, but not in the way that could be enforced by the supreme law. And if they had the forsight in this, they would have long ago acted to protect all in writing from the ignorance of others.

Yes, the reason why social nudity is not accepted in this country is because of a literal extreme blindness on just what our forefathers did and acted upon, without so much thinking about a natural right which everyone knew. There were no amenities such as a place to change, and very few had any underclothing, just outerwear, and a inherent right to stay clean against pestilence and deseases which were rampant in that day, much more so than today.

We bathe nude every day, shower with the convenience of shower curtains. But the forefathers of our country did not have such.

Neither did they care about such.

And they thought it a non-issue, as they did not even think that nudity was immoral in public under the right circumstances of public health and well being.

I have found personally as thousands upon thousands, perhaps millions upon millions of nudists and naturists have discovered for themselves, that nudity is not Concuspicuousness, any more than guns kill people as people only kill people, to pull the trigger, as to use a body sexually for the wrong purposes in the wrong place.

Simply put, some prudes would have you believe that naturism is only hedonism in disguise. No it is not. Naturists events are governed by the same laws of privacy as the constitution of this land protects in every way.

Anonymous writes...

The whole world likes naked women.

me writes...

we came into this world naked so why do they put there beloved dead ones in clothes wen they die?????? and who in the right mind would wanna walk round with their saggy bits hanging out??????

anonymous writes...

this is really creepy and i dont think its christian...... strongly dout it.

Joshua writes...

Um, God made clothes for Adam and Eve once sin entered into the world. Thus, original nudity began with innocence but ended with original sin. Thence forth, no more nudity, except as a shameful disgrace to a conquered nation. Read your Bible, it's all there.

mehmet writes...

no problem ı can come butı dont prray money

NudeDude writes...

If you want to look at if from the Christian Standpoint, nothing could be more Christian then being nude. Adam and Eve were created nude. Only when they shamed themselves did they wear clothing. By wearing clothing, we perpetuate the shame of Adam and Eve's wrong. In fact, God created them nude and thereby if we are to be closer to God, then we should be nude as he intended. Remember, God doesn't have a problem with the human body, only human's do.

Jesus writes...

Of course it's christ like, you know Jesus always had it dangling around town... why do you think he had everyone amazed all the time, because of magic tricks?!

L H Salmon writes...

First off, NudeDude states that wearing clothing perpetuates the shame of adam's sin? So is he saying that sin shouldn't be shameful? Sin will always be sin no matter how you spell it.

and so Jesus: That last comment was slightly blasphemous to be saying that the LORD and Son of God himself promoted nudity... because he didn't.

Dario Western writes...

For anyone who says it is not Biblical, I suggest that you re-read it in the context of what the scriptures actually meant it to be. Natural non-sexual nudity was never an issue in the Bible - it was only those who made fun of a naked person or used it for the sake of exploiting others who were punished over it. If God found nudity so offensive, then He/She wouldn't bring us into the world like that anymore.

Anonymous writes...

Thats not christian retards

fg writes...

adam & eve covered themselves in shame upon being self aware of being naked for eve tricking adam into eating the fruit from the tree in the center of the garden . God did not tell them to get dressed , he was shamed because of it. the covering up what he created.
Dont take words from the bible until you read the bible NON SEXUAL NUDITY IS NORMAL human beings are just ANIMALS have you simply forgot how to be human ?
Going to work , to the store is not normal it's humans that forgot who they are animals . to deny you natural self is not normal.

Kilrai writes...

Nudity is perfectly normal. It's close minded people that ruin it for the rest of us. The same type of people that tell me it's wrong for me to be barefoot in public. So much negativity and misconceptions that no one wants to let go of. For those who say nudity is a sin, then why isn't it part of the 10 Commandments? Murder is sin, being naked and happy is not.

John Kirk writes...

No point trying to redeem nudity this side of eternity. Man's fall changed everything.

You'll have to wait for Jesus to usher in a new heaven and a new earth first - then you can have your nudity. Will it even be an issue then?

Anonymous writes...

Will you all please shut up? Falling in love with God is awesome! Try that instead of squabbling over nude vs. non-nude. Falling in love is what matters, not debating over semantics. Being loved by God is the best thing that has ever happened to me!

Gop writes...

Cinema about nudists http://www.nudistworld.net/

Billi writes...

here are the best videos about nudists! http://www.nudistworld.net/

brtvsadullah writes...

brtvsadullah writes...